How does sanctions screening work?
Names and identifiers of customers, sellers, owners and counterparties are compared with official lists: the SDN list and other lists maintained by OFAC in the United States, the EU’s consolidated list of persons, groups and entities subject to financial sanctions, the UN Security Council Consolidated List and the UK Sanctions List, which the UK government says has been the only source for all UK designations since 28 January 2026. Matching is fuzzy, because names are spelled and transliterated in many ways. The UN list, for example, records names in their original script and separates good-quality aliases from low-quality ones that are probably not enough for an identification alone.
What happens after a hit?
Someone reviews it. OFAC’s guidance recommends comparing every detail of the listing with what is known about the party. If the match is not valid, the payment can proceed. If it is, the funds must be blocked or the transaction rejected, depending on the sanctions program, and OFAC requires blocked or rejected transactions to be reported within 10 business days. As an illustrative example: a marketplace screens 20,000 seller payouts a month and its tool raises alerts on 0.5% of them. If 98 of the 100 alerts are cleared as false positives, two payouts need deeper review, but all 100 wait until someone looks.
What are the trade-offs?
Loose matching floods the review queue and delays genuine customers; strict matching can miss a designated person spelled differently. Which lists apply depends on where a business and its providers operate, so the set-up should be agreed with compliance advisers.
Where does Omno use it?
Omno is not a sanctions screening vendor. Connected PSPs screen what they process under their own rules, and merchants screen customers and sellers in their own systems. Those outcomes can reach Omno through customer groups and customer verification levels, and payouts can be held for manual approval before they are released.